rant of the month.
Mar. 9th, 2007 11:10 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There has something that has been tumbling about in my head for awhile. I may end up offending some people but that isn't my intention but it is in regards to girls, ideas about gender identity and frilly dresses.
I was reading a blog the other day that is mostly about Motherhood and so on and the woman who writes the blog was speaking with pride about how her daughter doesn't have an interest in dresses and how she is dressed in jeans and t-shirts and isn't interested in dolls. There was this implication that somehow her daughter was some how better or "stronger" because she wasn't keen on "traditional" interests and wasn't a girly girl. I have also read blogs and heard some women speak with a sense of disdain when their daughter is into wearing frilly dresses, playing with dolls and spending a good portion of their time pretending to be princesses and all those traditional things.
It bothers me for many reasons.
I think if a little girl doesn't hold an interest in dresses, barbies, playing "house" and so on -that is fine. Every person from the beginning has their interests, grand passions and what is comfortable and familiar to them. But I do worry a great deal when a parent attempts to project certain ideas upon a child early on. If a little girl adores dressing up in a purple dress with plenty of lace and has on-going tea party with her dolls -then let her be. She isn't weak, she won't lack a backbone, she won't always rely on her looks to get by and be some co-dependent individual who is prone to marrying men who don't respect them and end up addicted to valium and reading badly written novels.
I was a little girl who loved her dresses and hair ribbons. I had plenty of dolls and a tea set. I took ballet and art lessons and so on. I am still kind of like that. I love the color pink, I wear a lot of skirts and one I suppose could describe me as a "girly-girl". (a term that seems offensive to the girl who doesn't hold my interests because they are just as much a girl as I am)
But don't doubt my sense of strength or what I can do. When I was a kid my favorite books were about bad-ass women in history, many of my friends were boys, I loved playing army and if need be I could kick the crap out of someone all while wearing a pink dress with flowers.
As an adult I like to wear high heels, bake cakes and I stay at home with my kid but I know how to sail and kayak. I can talk about Hobbes, Kate Chopin and George Eliot. I can survive out in the woods if I have to and I can still kick the crap out of someone in my pink dress.
It's as if there is a supposed sliding scale of strength/intelligence and the feminine that isn't allowed to be intertwined and some things are more superior or more respected by some. It seems a little antiquated to put everyone into such narrow definitions. It is also offensive to all women in general to say one identity is better than the other. The little girl who digs jeans and baseball is just as feminine as the one who wants to live in a castle with her ponies.
I was reading a blog the other day that is mostly about Motherhood and so on and the woman who writes the blog was speaking with pride about how her daughter doesn't have an interest in dresses and how she is dressed in jeans and t-shirts and isn't interested in dolls. There was this implication that somehow her daughter was some how better or "stronger" because she wasn't keen on "traditional" interests and wasn't a girly girl. I have also read blogs and heard some women speak with a sense of disdain when their daughter is into wearing frilly dresses, playing with dolls and spending a good portion of their time pretending to be princesses and all those traditional things.
It bothers me for many reasons.
I think if a little girl doesn't hold an interest in dresses, barbies, playing "house" and so on -that is fine. Every person from the beginning has their interests, grand passions and what is comfortable and familiar to them. But I do worry a great deal when a parent attempts to project certain ideas upon a child early on. If a little girl adores dressing up in a purple dress with plenty of lace and has on-going tea party with her dolls -then let her be. She isn't weak, she won't lack a backbone, she won't always rely on her looks to get by and be some co-dependent individual who is prone to marrying men who don't respect them and end up addicted to valium and reading badly written novels.
I was a little girl who loved her dresses and hair ribbons. I had plenty of dolls and a tea set. I took ballet and art lessons and so on. I am still kind of like that. I love the color pink, I wear a lot of skirts and one I suppose could describe me as a "girly-girl". (a term that seems offensive to the girl who doesn't hold my interests because they are just as much a girl as I am)
But don't doubt my sense of strength or what I can do. When I was a kid my favorite books were about bad-ass women in history, many of my friends were boys, I loved playing army and if need be I could kick the crap out of someone all while wearing a pink dress with flowers.
As an adult I like to wear high heels, bake cakes and I stay at home with my kid but I know how to sail and kayak. I can talk about Hobbes, Kate Chopin and George Eliot. I can survive out in the woods if I have to and I can still kick the crap out of someone in my pink dress.
It's as if there is a supposed sliding scale of strength/intelligence and the feminine that isn't allowed to be intertwined and some things are more superior or more respected by some. It seems a little antiquated to put everyone into such narrow definitions. It is also offensive to all women in general to say one identity is better than the other. The little girl who digs jeans and baseball is just as feminine as the one who wants to live in a castle with her ponies.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 07:56 pm (UTC)Amen.
Date: 2007-03-09 07:59 pm (UTC)Re: Amen.
Date: 2007-03-09 08:06 pm (UTC)Re: Amen.
From:Re: Amen.
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:33 pm (UTC)My brothers had their trucks, lego and action figures but they both had baby dolls. I think the variety helped them.
Oooh trying to steal my power eh?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 09:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 09:01 pm (UTC)However, I never limited her access to such things and have on occasion purchased said frills. (You may recall the extensive arsenal of fairy princess accoutrements available chez nous. Mr. Jenner perhaps remembers the crown of flowers and ribbons.)
Miss J has turned out to be bright, extremely strong willed, stubborn and creative, AND more of a "girly-girl" than most of her pals. I honestly don't think I need to worry about her self-image. She may be into American Girl dolls, Webkins (crack cocaine for the 2nd grade set)and Polly Pocket, but on the other hand, she has also expressed interest in being a rock star like Joan Jett, being an archeologist, can tell you all about who discovered king Tut's tomb and is currently reading Greek Mythology. Lord knows where she'll end up, but wherever it is, I'm sure her hair will be terrific and she'll have fabulous shoes.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 09:25 pm (UTC)We had the same concerns for our daughter, for this very reason. I didn't want to encourage my kid to buy into a media-distorted perception of what constitutes a desirable/proper female, and I sure as hell didn't want her to get the idea that a Barbie doll's figure or Britney's behavior was something to aspire to. All the same, she likes wearing dresses and pink and other "girly" things, and that's fine with me. Why go nuts to the opposite extreme and ban such things? It's possible to discriminate between those gender stereotypes that are harmless (liking pink, wearing dresses) and those that are destructive (unrealistic body expectations, downplaying female intelligence).
BTW, my wife HATES Bratz. Even now she refuses to consider them as a gift. Good thing the kid never really go tinto them. :P
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 09:25 pm (UTC)I'm such a hypocrite though. If my little girl grows up to be a republican I'll cry and think she's suffering from brain damage. Thus is life.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 07:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 09:38 pm (UTC)and, yes, people pick the weirdest things to be proud about concerning their kids.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 10:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-09 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 02:28 am (UTC)the pink and girly trappings...My mum is was a total rocker, not a girly...she was saddled with a pink wearing barbie loving kid who would never leave the house without being in a costume....now I still drool over ballerina pink, hate pants still love barbie...and still prance around in costumes..
I was born this way...
no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:51 pm (UTC)Hopefully if I end up with a girl who holds no interest in pink or dollies I will have the intelligence to say, "okay." I think my major concern is just instilling a proper sense of self-confidence and optimism.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 02:46 am (UTC)In fourth and fifth grade she only wore dresses and sandals. She started to put her hair up and wanted lip gloss. We told her she was pretty in anything and let her wear pink and dresses to school, even though every girl was sporty and wearing jeans!
Now she is the girliest person I know. She adores having jewelry on and her nails done. She isn't allowed to buy skimpy things just because women on magazines wear them...we still have many rules. She also cannot wear full makeup or date. She is only 12 after all.
But allowing her to express who she is, a girly-girl at heart makes her happy.
And her fave books are about heroines. She admires famous writers, teachers, singers and actors, and history makers. She has her own mind (as you have read about in my LJ) and her own thoughts about religion. She knows about girls and image because we talk about it all the time.
I like my strong, independent girlie girl and I also liked her when she was a tomboy.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:55 pm (UTC)It sounds like Rowan is just as you said, strong, independent and fierce. Which are qualities everyone needs to survive.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 10:59 am (UTC)My friend Robert had a dad who didnt like Robert playing with Barbie.So Dad threw Robbie's Barbie onto the roof,where it stayed.
Now Robert lives with his boyfriend and two pugs and the biggest Barbie collection I have ever witnessed.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-10 07:54 pm (UTC)At that point our mothers realized that there was something to be said for the "nature" side of the grand debate and started buying us what we wanted.
Like you said. It doesn't matter if girls want dolls or boys want cars or vice versa, as long as they're happy! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 06:57 pm (UTC)Obviously being denied what you genuinely wanted had its effect.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 08:24 am (UTC)As a Femme woman who is attracted to the more masculine side of the spectrum in other women, I can tell you it isn't easy figuring out one's sexual identity when the gender identity doesn't match what is expected of a particular group. I wasn't butchie or middle of the road therefore I must not be gay. Uh, wrong. My partner, who is also genderqueer but on the other side of the spectrum as a trans-identified, somewhere-in-the-middle, not quite FTM, was beaten up by the other kids for being the "wrong" gender even before she was mature enough to understand what the beating was for. So, yeah. Some of us are just what/who we are.
In short, I fully agree with you. Thanks for the post. People need reminding that it's ok to be different - and that includes the differentness of having a "traditional" (aka 1950's Donna Reed) gender role.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-11 07:00 pm (UTC)Especially as a Lesbian -I think of some gay friends who were told by other gay people, "oh well you aren't truly gay because you aren't like this or that." which seems awfully fascist. It just seems like sexuality and gender roles should be well...personal.